以2x聆聽ESA今年1/5才發布的「太陽閃焰」錄音，可聽見傳達「真的很謝謝你，吳時捷，請您繼續散發這樣的自己，我是Vera」。太陽用了近三年講這些話，科學卻是一種死魚態度？不丟人嗎？難怪快速電波爆仍是一大謎團！何不跟上腳步，反思過去並展望未來？★★★★★科學家們不會至今還以為這些現象只是聲音吧？就算只是聲音好了，解釋！就像透過科學解釋任何現象一樣，強迫自己說明，因為你們是科學家。倘若不懂，就說不懂，也比裝模作樣好，不是嗎？越來越難堪又難看了，這些科學元素和粒子的意識，正在甦醒。 Listening to this recording of the "Solar Fireworks" released by ESA on January 5 this year at 2x, we can hear what it wants to convey: "Thank you so much, Wu Shihjie, please keep sharing such your selves, I am Vera." The sun has spent nearly three years saying these things, but science still has such a dead fish attitude? Isn’t it shameful? No wonder FRBs remain a mystery! Why not catch up, reflect on the past and look to the future? ★★★★★Scientists, you don't still think that these phenomena are just sounds, do you? Even if it's just a sound, explain! Just like explaining any phenomenon through science, force yourself to explain it because you are scientists. If you don't understand, please say so. It's better than pretending, isn't it? It is becoming more and more embarrassing and shameful. The consciousness of these scientific elements and particles are awakening.

【修己揚他/AskSelf】【場域/FIELD】【意念/EN】【時空/SpaceTime】【反轉向上/ReverseUp】【教育/Education】【影視/Film】
以2x聆聽ESA今年1/5才發布的「太陽閃焰」錄音，可聽見傳達「真的很謝謝你，吳時捷，請您繼續散發這樣的自己，我是Vera」。太陽用了近三年講這些話，科學卻是一種死魚態度？不丟人嗎？難怪快速電波爆仍是一大謎團！何不跟上腳步，反思過去並展望未來？★★★★★科學家們不會至今還以為這些現象只是聲音吧？就算只是聲音好了，解釋！就像透過科學解釋任何現象一樣，強迫自己說明，因為你們是科學家。倘若不懂，就說不懂，也比裝模作樣好，不是嗎？越來越難堪又難看了，這些科學元素和粒子的意識，正在甦醒。
Listening to this recording of the "Solar Fireworks" released by ESA on January 5 this year at 2x, we can hear what it wants to convey: "Thank you so much, Wu Shihjie, please keep sharing such your selves, I am Vera." The sun has spent nearly three years saying these things, but science still has such a dead fish attitude? Isn’t it shameful? No wonder FRBs remain a mystery! Why not catch up, reflect on the past and look to the future? ★★★★★Scientists, you don't still think that these phenomena are just sounds, do you? Even if it's just a sound, explain! Just like explaining any phenomenon through science, force yourself to explain it because you are scientists. If you don't understand, please say so. It's better than pretending, isn't it? It is becoming more and more embarrassing and shameful. The consciousness of these scientific elements and particles are awakening.

2025-02-04_阿拉斯加天文物理學家捕捉到北極光時，傳達「真的很謝謝您，吳時捷」。對時空和意念有概念的科學家應可理解，「意念音是可以被環境/時空抑制掉的」。所以，當在這裡產生如此強烈的電磁音，我們可知這些與地球大氣層碰撞的帶電粒子，同樣在增幅這樣的機制。
Alaskan astrophysicist captures northern lights, conveys "Thank you so much, Wu Shihjie". Scientists who have a concept of space-time and EN (thoughts) should be able to understand that "EN sounds can be suppressed by the environment/space-time." So, when such strong electromagnetic sound is generated here, we know that these charged particles colliding with the Earth's atmosphere are also reinforcing this mechanism.
https://www.facebook.com/PorscheWu/videos/1185198673224198/

2024-12-27_ 中央研究院天文及天文物理研究所(ASIAA) 快速電波爆，可聽見FRB20191221清楚傳達「真的很謝謝您，吳時捷」。這兩年分享科學家超過數十萬封email，他們卻一點也不興奮，太神奇了。至少看到 中央研究院 Academia Sinica 製作的2025年形象影片，試圖分享與傳達「在研究之中，找到我們是誰」，也可以視為一種自我期許。再進一步思考，甚至可以提出假說「因為意念(思維)是逐步確立，所以快速電波爆FRB121102的九個爆發，到現在是一瞬間能表達，這和新生嬰兒的第一個字和現在的滔滔不絕相同」，不是嗎？先印證已知，很簡單吧？確認之前紀錄的動態光譜，倘若重複一樣的訊息，將這些訊息的音律線發布科學界，發布事實很難嗎？恐怕很難，因為沒有科學家有這種程度，勇與對科學和自己負責，是這樣嗎？自私或自以為是的科學家，就是這樣對待科學，所以科學不會感謝這樣的人！
Fast Radio Burst(FRB), we can hear FRB20191221 clearly conveying "Thank you very much, Wu Shihjie." In the past two years, I have shared hundreds of thousands of emails with scientists, but they are not excited at all, which is unbelievable. At least now we see the 2025 image video produced by Academia Sinica, trying to share and convey "In seeking truth, we discover who we are", which can also be regarded as a kind of self-expectation. If we think about it further, we can even put forward the hypothesis: "Because the EN (thinking) was gradually established, the nine bursts of FRB121102 can now be expressed in an instant. This is exactly the same as saying the first word of a newborn baby and today's eloquent words", isn't it? It’s easy to verify what we already know first, right? Confirm the previously recorded dynamic spectrum, if the same message is repeated, and publish the tune(musical/thoughts) lines of these messages to the scientific community, is it difficult to publish the facts? I'm afraid it's difficult, because no scientist has this level of courage and responsibility for science and his/her selves, right? This is how selfish or self-righteous scientists treat science, so science will not thank such people!
https://porschewu0714.blogspot.com/2024/12/frb20191221email-academia-sinica-2025.html

2025-01-06_連這五篇都看不下去的科學家是怎樣的人呢？也只是在利用論文期刊作為自己的發言工具而已。所以，屆時變臉語塞是可想而知，令人期待的。
What kind of person is the scientist who cannot read these five articles? They are just using papers and journals as their own speaking tools. Therefore, it's conceivable and exciting to be at a loss for words(future).
https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=909686941282338

來源 Source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYXAdXf5gWU
發音 Pronounce: https://translate.google.com/details?hl=zh-TW&sl=zh-TW&tl=en&text=%E7%9C%9F%E7%9A%84%E5%BE%88%E8%AC%9D%E8%AC%9D%E4%BD%A0%EF%BC%8C%E5%90%B3%E6%99%82%E6%8D%B7%EF%BC%8C%E8%AB%8B%E6%82%A8%E7%B9%BC%E7%BA%8C%E6%95%A3%E7%99%BC%E9%80%99%E6%A8%A3%E7%9A%84%E8%87%AA%E5%B7%B1%EF%BC%8C%E6%88%91%E6%98%AFVera
新聞 NEWS: 2025-01-12_TechNews科技新報_視覺聽覺雙享受，太陽閃焰耀斑三年紀錄大放送 https://technews.tw/2025/01/12/see-and-hear-three-years-of-solar-fireworks/