商業上很多人翻來覆去或背信，包含很多邏輯與思維上的矛盾與歪斜。也會看到很多人很喜歡胡亂總結或指揮，很像是自己比較懂一樣，但實際上跟他們沒什麼關係[1](也許有時是和他們的利益或偏差思想有關)。
In business, many people go back and forth or break their promises, which contains many contradictions and distortions in logic and thinking. We can also see that many people like to summarize or direct indiscriminately, as if they understand better, but in fact it has nothing to do with them [1] (Maybe sometimes it's about their interests or biased thinking).
Binance Binance.US 幣安 Binance 中文專頁 (請協助傳達給CZ、Do Kwon等人，謝謝你們。 Help convey to CZ, Do Kwon and others, thank you.)
Binance Binance.US 幣安 Binance 中文專頁 (請協助傳達給CZ、Do Kwon等人，謝謝你們。 Help convey to CZ, Do Kwon and others, thank you.)
注意SBF實際上講的內容和背後的意義是什麼呢？好像是有說明什麼的場面話，但實際上是規避責任。是否有一點點像是 張善政 陳時中 和 高虹安 等人呢？
Notice what SBF actually says and what is the meaning behind it? It seems that there is a pleasantry to explain something, but in fact it is to avoid responsibility. Is it a little bit like Zhang, Chen and Gao and others?
SBF的道歉信中，完全不回應外界對客戶資金遭挪用的強烈質疑。我認為當然是因為SBF已在11日宣布申請破產保護，且同時辭去CEO一職，所以他沒必要回應這些問題來影響自己的聲譽
。
In the apology letter of SBF, it did not respond to the strong doubts about the misappropriation of customer funds. I think of course it is because SBF has filed for bankruptcy protection on the 11th and resigned as CEO at the same time, so there is no need for him to respond to these questions to affect his reputation.
如果是這樣，當然就是個很糟糕的人。
If so, of course he is a very lousy person.
SBF還在信中說「也許還有機會拯救公司。 我相信新投資者有投入數十億美元的真正興趣讓客戶資金變得完整。但我不能向你保證任何事情都會發生，因為這不是我的選擇。」。
SBF also said in the letter. "Maybe there is still a chance to save the company," he said in the letter Tuesday. "I believe that there are billions of dollars of genuine interest from new investors that could go to making customers whole. But I can't promise you that anything will happen, because it's not my choice."
可以看到他說「我不是故意讓這一切發生，我願意付出任何代價，以便能夠回去重新做事。你們是我的家人，但我把公司弄丟了」。
"I didn't mean for any of this to happen, and I would give anything to be able to go back and do things over again. You were my family," he said.
「沒有意識到保證金部位的全部範圍，也沒有意識到相關崩盤所帶來的風險重大程度。」這樣還不算是他的責任嗎？
Bankman-Fried "did not realize the full extent of the margin position" or the risk that a correlated crash meant, he said. Isn't that his responsibility?
這樣可以說「我不是故意的」，還說「願意負一切代價」。接著「宣布申請破產保護」，宣布就表示他已經做了，最後才說「有可能挽救什麼」，這種鬼話連篇的內容。
In this way, he can say "I didn't mean it" and "I would give anything to be able to go back." Then "announced filing for bankruptcy protection", the announcement means that he has done it, and finally said that "Maybe there is still a chance to save the company", this kind of nonsense.
14日還有臉表示「他目前人還在巴哈馬，能睡得著，並打電動讓自己腦袋保持清醒。」
On the 14th, he still had the face to say, "He is still in the Bahamas, can sleep, and plays video games to keep his head awake."
真是有夠不要臉，還睡得著表示衣食無缺，人也好好的。然後要裝很像是精神壓力很大一樣。所以他說他自己「靠打電動讓自己腦袋保持清醒」？
It's really shameless, and he can still sleep to show that he has enough food and clothing, and his situation is okay, and then why he has to pretend that it looks like he is under a lot of mental stress. So he said that he "keeps his head clear by playing video games?"
那怎麼不挺起胸膛面對，還裝模作樣地裝可憐。看看人家Do Kwon怎樣面對Terra的挫敗，和趕快想辦法轉圜。這種爛咖，還說「市場年中之後的崩盤，是Terra引起的後續一連串爆雷」這種推卸責任還胡亂歸因的別人身上，真是完全惡質！
Then why doesn't he face it with his chest up, and pretend to be pitiful. Take a look at how Do Kwon faced Terra's setbacks, and quickly find a way to turn around. This kind of rotten guy, who also said that "the market crash after the middle of the year was a series of subsequent thunderstorms caused by Terra", who shirks responsibility and randomly attributes it to others, is really bastard!
各位也可以看到BitCoin整個目前的收斂與壓縮。雖然Terra是發生問題，裡面有非常多的意念形加密貨幣在流動沒錯。但人家Do Kwon有努力，我相信會有更多人去協助他的，只要我們坦蕩，願意負責一點一滴修正，崩盤有什麼關係！
You can also see the entire current convergence and compression of BitCoin. Although there is a problem with Terra, there are a lot of EN-type cryptocurrencies flowing in it. But Do Kwon has worked hard, I believe there will be more people to help him, as long as we are open and willing to take responsibility for every bit of correction, it doesn’t matter what the crash is!
趙長鵬，你必須要多注意我說的商業上很多人翻來覆去或背信，包含很多邏輯與思維上的矛盾與歪斜。也會看到很多人很喜歡胡亂總結或指揮，很像是自己比較懂一樣，但實際上跟他們沒什麼關係[1]。並且，還有很多過往不良意念會被收斂掉，其實會以金融貨幣或加密貨幣很快地蒸發掉的現象。
CZ, you must pay more attention to what I said about many people going back and forth or breaking promises in business, which contains many contradictions and distortions in logic and thinking. We can also see that many people like to summarize or direct indiscriminately, as if they understand better, but in fact it has nothing to do with them [1]. Moreover, there are still many bad ENs of the past that will be restrained, and will actually evaporate quickly with financial currency or cryptocurrency.
注意SBF提到「貸款和二次銷售通常用於對業務進行再投資，包括收購幣安的股份，而不是用於大量個人消費。」。
SBF said, "The loans and secondary sales were generally used to reinvest in the business – including buying out Binance – and not for large amounts of personal consumption."
表示，他們在嘗試裂解你們幣安Binance。收購你們的股份，就表示把他們那種裂解操控意念的意念錢灌給你們做發展。
Said that they are trying to crack your Binance. Purchasing your shares means giving you money for their EN-type fund of cracking and manipulating ENs for development.
所以，一定不要去追逐利益。CZ，你更要把這樣的思維傳達給你的好友們。有多的金錢，在不影響運作下，要盡可能多去幫助一些好的人還有好的想法實踐，繼續加油喔！
Therefore, you must not pursue interests. CZ, you should convey this thinking to your friends. With so much money, without affecting the operation, we should help as many good people as possible and implement good ideas!
[1] 2022-10-03_【修己揚他/AskSelf】
對於CZ的謹慎與維持幣圈良好生態的風範，感到十分與有榮焉！
I feel very proud of CZ's caution and maintaining a good ecological demeanor in the cryptocurrency circle!
==Blog, Facebook, YouTube==
部落格更多重要內容(建議以桌機模式檢視) More important content on the blog (recommended in desktop mode):
沒有留言:
張貼留言
歡迎留言討論指教！