2022年10月3日 星期一

對於CZ的謹慎與維持幣圈良好生態的風範,感到十分與有榮焉! I feel very proud of CZ's caution and maintaining a good ecological demeanor in the cryptocurrency circle!

【修己揚他/AskSelf】
對於CZ的謹慎與維持幣圈良好生態的風範,感到十分與有榮焉!
I feel very proud of CZ's caution and maintaining a good ecological demeanor in the cryptocurrency circle!

Binance Terra Luna Classic Community (LUNC) Terra Luna Classic (UST and Luna 2.0) Terra Luna Classic LUNC Terra Luna (crypto blockchain)

CZ不敵「抵制幣安運動」?引發 LUNC 社群眾怒,為平息爭議才做出反應?[1] 動區動趨 BlockTempo - 由社群而生的區塊鏈媒體 - Media for Blockchain 你們要自我檢討,你們的作者James不應該寫下這種煽動又偏頗的敘述,是吧!?請你們趕快要求他們「修己揚他」啊!

Defeated by "Binance Boycott"? Triggering outrage at LUNC, so reacts to quell the controversy?[1] BlockTempo, you have to examine and ask yourself, the author, James, shall not write such inflammatory and biased statements, right? Hurry up and ask them to "cultivate themselves and raise others"!

幣安本來就是交易所,有自己的格調與步伐。Terra舊鏈Terra Classic(LUNC)在9-21正式上線1.2%燃燒稅政策,Binance本來就沒必要跟著你們Terra團團轉。

Binance is originally an exchange with its own style and pace. Terra old chain Terra Classic (LUNC) officially launched a 1.2% burning tax policy on 9-21, and Binance did not have to follow you Terra around.

更不用說CZ是怎麼構思與協同處理這個事件的呢?

Not to mention how did CZ conceive and collaborate on this event? 

「交易費用將轉換為 LUNC,然後發送至銷毀地址,燒毀費用由幣安支付、而非用戶。」還有「幣安仍可以為 LUNC 的供應減少做出貢獻,這正是社群想要的。」

"Fees will be converted to LUNC then sent to the burn address. The burn is paid at our expense, not the users." and " Binance can still contribute to the supply decrease of LUNC, which is what the community wants."

CZ正為LUNC的生態盡一份心力,等同協助Do Kwon和Terra,不是嗎?更何況,他還考量到所有的用戶,表示「這樣我們就可以對所有用戶公平。」

CZ is doing his part for the LUNC ecosystem, which is equivalent to assisting Do Kwon and Terra, isn't it? He also considered all the uers in the cryptocurrency circle, saying "This way we can be fair to all users."

另外,這位優秀的Joe Crypto,他其實很了解怎樣是一個好的生態。他(Tweet)指出「請停止抵制,別這麼傻,LUNC 因為你們而下跌,你不是在罵幣安,你是在欺負小額投資者,如果你們停止抵制, LUNC 將很快漲至 1 美元。」

And then there's this wonderful Joe Crypto, who actually knows a good ecology. He pointed out "Stop the #boycott. Don't be silly. #LUNC is falling because of you guys. You're not scolding #Binance, you're bullying small investments. If you guys stop boycotting, #LUNC goes at $1 fast. If you agree, follow, retweet or like."

再看看文章提到的CryptoKing(Tweet)表示「如果沒有抵制幣安運動,CZ 將永遠不會為 $LUNC 交易者提出選擇性加入選項的建議。」

Look again at the article CryptoKing's statement that "Without the #BoycottBinance movement CZ would have never put out the proposal for the opt-in option for $LUNC traders."

這位CryptoKing會不會想太多?搞不懂你們這些為了自己的利益在猖狂的人,怎麼好意思把事情講得如此負面,還把光環往自己身上攬。你們這些人正是敗壞LUNC生態的人,請你們搞清楚事實

Was CryptoKing thinking too much? I don't understand how you, who are running amok for your own interests, can be so kind as to talk about things so negatively and still take the aura on yourself. You people are the ones who corrupt the LUNC ecology, please find out the facts first!

我完全同意Joe Crypto的真實揭露!而且對於CZ的謹慎與維持幣圈良好生態的風範,感到十分與有榮焉!我想CZ是因為他看不過去...
1. 這些人為了利益不惜煽動。
2. 這些舉動背後覬覦的私利以及貪婪。
3. 對於幣圈生態的不良影響。
4. 這樣的事情會持續傷害Do Kwon與Terra。

I totally agree with Joe Crypto's true disclosure! And I feel very proud of CZ's caution and maintaining a good ecological demeanor in the cryptocurrency circle! I think CZ is because he doesn't agree with...
1. These people who are willing to incite just for the sake of profit.
2. The coveted self-interest and greed behind these moves.
3. The bad impact on the ecology of the cryptocurrency circle.
4. Such things will continue to hurt Do Kwon and Terra.

CZ提出「選擇性加入機制」的原因,根本就不是為了平息眾怒,或遇到「抵制幣安運動」。而是他心中非常清楚「強制繳稅是中心化,高稅額是貪婪!」更應該請大家在這次的事件中,觀察並學習CZ是怎麼做人處事和思考的!

The reason CZ proposed the "opt-in mechanism" is not at all to calm public anger or encounter a "boycott of Binance movement". Instead, he knew very well in his mind that "compulsory tax payment is centralized, and high taxes are greed!" In this incident, we should also ask ourselves to observe and learn how CZ behaves and thinks!

(2022-10-19編輯 Edited) 2018年左右,CZ來台灣內湖舉辦一場幣安與加密貨幣的盛會時,有幸與他有一面之緣。那時便覺得他的專注與熱情,讓我印象深刻!而我在這篇報導中[3],又看到CZ對於所謂的財富之十分卓越的一面。NAS的Yassin也介紹了CZ,「他計畫將他的財富捐贈到慈善機構」[4]。

Around 2018, when CZ came to Neihu, Taiwan to host a Binance and cryptocurrency event, I was fortunate to meet him. At that time, I felt that his dedication and enthusiasm impressed me deeply! And in this article[3], I see CZ's remarkable side about so-called wealth. NAS's Yassin also introduced CZ, "He plans to donate his wealth to charity." [4]
CZ似乎對財富應該給別人留下深刻印象的想法感到困惑。「如果他們認為我的身價有那麼多,那就隨他們吧。」CZ 告訴我,「這是虛構的定價。」

CZ seems confused by the idea that wealth should impress others. "If they think I'm worth that much, let it be." CZ told me, "This is fictitious pricing."
[1] 2022-09-26 BlockTempo動區 《LUNC秒漲46%!CZ不敵「抵制幣安運動」改全面銷毀 Lunc 交易手續費》 https://www.blocktempo.com/lunc-community-calls-for-boycott-of-binance/

[2] 2022-09-26 BlockTempo動區 《CZ呼籲「把你的 LUNC 轉來幣安投票吧」: 直接強制1.2%交易稅是中心化》 https://www.blocktempo.com/cz-responds-that-lunc-burninng-tax-is-centralized-and-greedy/

[3] 2022-03-31 鏈新聞 《財富雜誌》訪談|幣安創辦人趙長鵬:即將公開總部地址 https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4844959

[4] 2022-05-06 Nas Daily 中文 《Most Humble Crypto Billionaire》 https://www.facebook.com/nasdailyzh/videos/4602245386541791/

沒有留言:

張貼留言

歡迎留言討論指教!