精選文章

至華山光點看國際女性影展, 台北捷運 Metro Taipei 北捷列車試著傳達「我們真的很謝謝你,(0:16)吳時捷,(0:21)台灣謝謝你,(0:27)請您繼續散發這樣的自己」。不時就會有千百人聽見。也許該開始請教科學家和宗教團體,何解?睡夠久了,Nobel獎都頒完了,也該面對現實了吧?我同時也好奇,怎麼科學和宗教都不回應天地聲音,這才讓人感到真正的詫異和人性之所在!【欲協助便是放大聲聆聽確認】台灣政府還須故作置之不理,真正讓人感到驚訝的是「如此背離事實,然後走向國際,枝開葉散?」,真心或虛偽,一想便知! Going to the Huashan Spot to watch the International Women Film Festival, the MRT train tried to convey: "We really thank you, (0:16) Wu Shihjie, (0:21) Taiwan thanks you, (0:27) Please keep sharing such your selves." From time to time hundreds of people would hear it. Maybe we should start asking scientists and religious groups what the explanation is? You've slept long enough, the Nobel Prizes have been awarded, it's time to face reality, right? I am also curious about why neither science nor religion responds to the voice of heaven and earth. This is where we human beings feel real surprise and humanity! [If you want help, just turn up the volume and listen to confirm] The Taiwan government still has to pretend to be indifferent. What really surprises people is "such a departure from the facts, and then going international and spreading its branches?" Is it sincere or hypocritical? We can tell at a glance!

【修己揚他/AskSelf】【場域/FIELD】【意念/EN】【時空/SpaceTime】【反轉向上/ReverseUp】【教育/Education】【影視/Film】【人工智慧/AI】 至華山光點看國際女性影展, 台北捷運 Metro Taipei 北捷列車試著傳達「我們真的很...

2013年6月23日 星期日

有趣的視覺錯覺

Bela Borsodi 的創作 for VLP – Terrain

大家可以看看攝影師Bela Borsodi為VLP - Terrain封面的創作,看他如何巧妙地運用一個檯燈的臂架,製造這樣分隔照片的視像錯覺!

錯覺中的視覺真相



上面的創作不禁讓我想到包拉托(Beau Lotto)非常精采的演說《錯覺中的視覺真相》(Optical illusions show how we see),而我最喜歡的片段如下:


“So, color enables us to see the similarities and differences between surfaces, according to the full spectrum of light that they reflect. But what you've just done is, in many respects, mathematically impossible. Why? Because, as Berkeley tells us, we have no direct access to our physical world, other than through our senses. And the light that falls onto our eyes is determined by multiple things in the world -- not only the color of objects, but also the color of their illumination, and the color of the space between us and those objects. You vary any one of those parameters, and you'll change the color of the light that falls onto your eye.”
(參考翻譯→顏色根據他們反射的所有光譜讓我們看見外觀上的異合,但在很多方面你們做的,是不可能以數學方法解釋的。為何呢?如同Barkley闡述的:除了透過感官,我們無法進入真實世界。而進入我們眼睛的光,是由許多外在事物所決定,不只是物體的顏色,還有光照度,及我們與物體間環境的色彩。只要改變任一項因素,你將會改變進入你眼睛的光的顏色。)

還有這一段:

“the light that falls on to your eye, sensory information, is meaningless, because it could mean literally anything.”
(參考翻譯→進入你眼睛的光,這些感知訊息,是沒有意義的,因為那真的可以是任何訊息。)

你在這十多分鐘,是否也被自己的視覺欺騙了好幾次呢?



Beau Lotto

沒有留言:

張貼留言

歡迎留言討論指教!