2024年8月30日 星期五

(Share to 程天縱,曾任中國惠普總裁、德州儀器亞太總裁、富士康集團副總裁)「管理」和「領導」,最大的差異,在於「管理」以方法治理,而「領導」在於引路自動。任何造成國家、企業、個人氣質或氛圍★持續轉變★的人(力量),即為「領導」。 (Share to Terry Cheng, former President of Hewlett-Packard China, President of Texas Instruments Asia Pacific, and Vice President of Foxconn Group) The biggest difference between "management" and "leadership" is that "management" uses methods to govern while "leadership" is about guiding the direction and supporting others to move forward by their own selves. Anyone (any force) who causes ★sustained change★ in a country, company, personal temperament or atmosphere is a "leader".

【修己揚他/AskSelf】【教育/Education】【領導/Leadership】
(Share to 程天縱,曾任中國惠普總裁、德州儀器亞太總裁、富士康集團副總裁)「管理」和「領導」,最大的差異,在於「管理」以方法治理,而「領導」在於引路自動。任何造成國家、企業、個人氣質或氛圍★持續轉變★的人(力量),即為「領導」。
(Share to Terry Cheng, former President of Hewlett-Packard China, President of Texas Instruments Asia Pacific, and Vice President of Foxconn Group) The biggest difference between "management" and "leadership" is that "management" uses methods to govern while "leadership" is about guiding the direction and supporting others to move forward by their own selves. Anyone (any force) who causes ★sustained change★ in a country, company, personal temperament or atmosphere is a "leader".
 


程天縱 是的,十分認同。像是代為簽名、流於口頭允諾與兌現等現象,看似只是做了一些協助或幫忙的事,實則容易遮掩平常的疏漏之處,讓公司與管理階層常常誤以為企業狀況合於公司規範與期待。
Yes, totally agree. Phenomenons such as signing on behalf of others and making verbal promises and fulfillments may seem like they are just doing something to assist or help, but in fact, it is easy to cover up ordinary omissions, making the company and management often mistakenly believe that the company's status is in compliance with company standards, regulations and expectations.

當照著既有制度來發展或佈局時,這些被cover的細節,便成了不順遂,無論是在制度面或人心之間。
When the development or layout is based on the existing system, these covered details would become unsatisfactory, whether in the system or in people's hearts.

企業間的同仁或勞資關係,時間一長多少也明白其中作為,久了便成一種內傷,難以察覺和修復。
As time goes by, colleagues in the enterprise or in the labor-management relationship would understand to some extent what is going on. Over time, it would become an internal injury that is difficult to detect and repair.

==

我個人認為,「管理」和「領導」可從原本的字義中來思考起。
I personally think that "management" and "leadership" can be thought of from the original meaning of the word.

一、管理:管,為「約束」的凝煉;理,則為「方法脈絡」。
1. Management: Management is the convergence of "restraint"; management is the "method context".
二、領導:領,為「攜著」之意象;導,則為「牽引自行(動)」。
2. Leadership: Leading means "carrying"; guiding means "pulling oneself (moving) by their own selves".

兩者最大的差異,在於「管理」以方法治理,而「領導」在於引路自動。
The biggest difference between "management" and "leadership" is that "management" uses methods to govern while "leadership" is about guiding the direction and supporting others to move forward by their own selves.

任何造成國家、企業、個人氣質或氛圍★持續轉變★的人(力量),即為「領導」。
 Anyone (any force) who causes ★sustained change★ in a country, company, personal temperament or atmosphere is a "leader".

當然,我無法否認的是,宗教也算是一種, 而重點在於怎麼領導而已。
Of course, I cannot deny that religion is also a kind of leadership, and the focus is on how to lead.

對我而言,「找到自己」是第一步;「如何領導(牽引)自己」,則是現在全世界各國和所有人的首要課題。
For me, "finding yourself" is the first step; "how to lead (pull) yourself" is now the primary issue for all countries and people around the world.

==

而程天縱看完後,回應我的分享:「你有經驗」。
After reading it, Terry Cheng responded to my sharing: "You are experienced."


2024-07-30_現在,天地萬物正在匯集這個意念,也就是「找到自己」。
Now, all living beings in the world are gathering this EN (thought), which is to "find/know yourself/your selves".

其實,我分享給 于美人 、 陳文茜 和 龍應台 的內容,對於理解這件事情都有助益!
In fact, the content I shared with them was helpful in understanding this matter!

#CEOConnotation

沒有留言:

張貼留言

歡迎留言討論指教!